Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: G.P.Moss (g.p.moss$##$
Date: Wed Mar 03 2004 - 13:24:33 EST

Contrary to Ilya's message this compound cannot be named as totally by
fusion nomenclature as there is a 1,3-benzene unit. Furthermore fusion is
only to a component with the maximum number of noncumulative double bonds.
If you want a fusion name I would suggest:


However phane nomenclature is much easier, shorter and clearer. This


For details of the relevant IUPAC documents see:

Gerry Moss

Dr GP Moss Telephone: +44 20 7882 4838
Department of Chemistry
Queen Mary University of London Facsimile: +44 20 7882 7794
Mile End Road
London E1 4NS, United Kingdom E-mail: g.p.moss$##$

IUPAC chemical nomenclature database:
IUBMB biochemical nomenclature database:

ORGLIST - Organic Chemistry Mailing List
Website / Archive / FAQ:
To post a message (TO EVERYBODY) send to everybody$##$
To unsubscribe, send to everybody-request$##$ the message: unsubscribe your_orglist_password your_address
List coordinator: Joao Aires de Sousa (coordinator$##$

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:07:00 EST